Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Meta allowed pornographic ads that violate its content moderation rules

Meta allowed pornographic ads that violate its content moderation rules

Meta owns social media platforms including Facebook and Instagram

JRdes/Shutterstock

By 2024, Meta allowed more than 3,300 pornographic ads – many with AI-generated content – ​​on its social media platforms, including Facebook and Instagram.

The findings come from a report by AI Forensics, a European non-profit organization focused on investigating technology platform algorithms. The researchers also discovered an inconsistency in Meta’s content moderation policies by re-uploading many of the same explicit images as standard posts on Instagram and Facebook. Unlike the ads, these posts were quickly removed for violating Meta’s community standards.

“I am both disappointed and not surprised by the report, as my research has already revealed double standards in content moderation, particularly in the area of ​​sexual content,” said Carolina Are of Northumbria University’s Center for Digital Citizens in the UK.

The AI ​​Forensics report focused on a small sample of ads targeting the EU. It found that the explicit ads allowed by Meta primarily targeted middle-aged and older men with promotions for “dubious sexual enhancement products” and “hook-up dating sites,” with a combined reach of more than 8.2 million views.

Such leniency reflects a broader double standard in content moderation, Are says. Tech platforms often block content by and for “women, femme-presenting and LGBTQIA+ users,” she says. The double standard extends to male and female sexual health. “One example is lingerie and period-related ads [removed] from Meta, while ads for Viagra are approved,” she says.

In addition to finding AI-generated images in the ads, the AI ​​Forensics team also detected audio deepfakes: In some ads for sexual enhancement drugs, for example, pornographic images were superimposed with the digitally manipulated voice of actor Vincent Cassel.

“Meta prohibits the display of nudity or sexual activity in ads or organic listings on our platforms, and we remove the offending content that was shared with us,” a Meta spokesperson said. “Bad actors are constantly evolving their tactics to avoid enforcement, which is why we continue to invest in the best tools and technology to help identify and remove infringing content.”

The report coincides with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announcing that the company will ditch its fact-checking teams in favor of crowdsourced community notes.

“If we want to sound really dystopian — and at this point, given Zuckerberg’s recent decision to remove fact-checkers, I think we have reason to be — we might even say that Meta is just as quick to disenfranchise individual, marginalized users their agency, as it is to take money from questionable ads,” says Are.

Subjects:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *